Im a pretty simple guy...
I like fast cars, big guns, explosions, rock n roll and women...
Born and raised on Racing, Fast Cars, Guns and Rock N Roll.

I drive a 2011 SXT Challenger [Plan on upgrading to an SRT]
My Brother drives a 1998 R34 Skyline GTT.
My girlfriend plans on getting a Charger R/T

I street race anything, I drift anything with wheels and a motor, I'm an Adrenaline Junkie, Simple guy over all.

I have a kick ass girlfriend that is very similar to me, she is super beautiful and awesome. [Motor-Obsession]

From New Brunswick, Canada.

29th July 2014

Post with 3 notes

Oh hey! MOPAR UPDATE. I’m selling my challenger and buying a challenger… RT classic, 6speed, black. I already have coil overs for it, a tuner, and a bunch of other shit lol

Just thought id let you guys know… That and my laptop is still fucked so I can’t post was much…

29th July 2014

Post with 1 note

Almost a full week without a working laptop… Doing everything from my phone sucks..

Anyone decent at fixing macs can lend me some help? It’s slow as fuck… I removed everything I could but can’t figure out how to factory reset it without taking 18 years… To give you an idea of how slow it is… I click system settings and literally 5-10 minutes later it shows up…
And dont wanna spend an arm and a leg getting it fixed by apple..

28th July 2014

Photo with 1 note

Breaking bad at work!

Breaking bad at work!

28th July 2014

Photo reblogged from Can it wait? I'm doing some calibrations. with 51,093 notes

Source: iraffiruse

28th July 2014

Photo reblogged from THE VAULT with 2,638 notes

sexxx-on-wheels:

so dope

sexxx-on-wheels:

so dope

Source: sexxx-on-wheels

28th July 2014

Photo reblogged from 1968 Dodge Charger R/T | Scott Crawford with 127 notes

themusclecar:

1968 Dodge Charger R/T | Scott Crawford - Froyo Stop on Flickr.

themusclecar:

1968 Dodge Charger R/T | Scott Crawford - Froyo Stop on Flickr.

28th July 2014

Photo reblogged from CarWhore with 91 notes

crookedhalo78:

badz371:

Mmm…so sexy!!

Mmmmm. Yes. Bc. Sexy is not always the the moan she makes… It’s the rumble under the hood. It’s not the curve of her hip but the sexy little pinstripe following the body line…

crookedhalo78:

badz371:

Mmm…so sexy!!

Mmmmm. Yes. Bc. Sexy is not always the the moan she makes… It’s the rumble under the hood. It’s not the curve of her hip but the sexy little pinstripe following the body line…

Source: plutoniumrain

28th July 2014

Photo reblogged from CarWhore with 78 notes

musclecardreaming:

2010 Challenger

musclecardreaming:

2010 Challenger

Source: musclecardreaming

28th July 2014

Photo reblogged from CarWhore with 45 notes

Source: zfallguy

28th July 2014

Photo reblogged from CarWhore with 635 notes

fullthrottleauto:

Dodge Challenger (FT)

fullthrottleauto:

Dodge Challenger (FT)

Source: fullthrottleauto

28th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from with 134,080 notes

majesticaljeff:

This is golden

Source: captainsteves

28th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from with 24,293 notes

mooseleys:

(x)

Source: mooseleys

28th July 2014

Photo reblogged from I Have A Need For Speed with 242 notes

automotivated:

Dodge Viper ADV10 M.V2 SL Series by ADV1WHEELS on Flickr.

automotivated:

Dodge Viper ADV10 M.V2 SL Series by ADV1WHEELS on Flickr.

Source: automotivated

28th July 2014

Photo reblogged from I Have A Need For Speed with 231 notes

spdcrzy:

classandcars:

drivestvmotorsport:

A Viper misses his braking point during practice at the Toronto Pirelli World Challenge practice. 

I swear some WC drivers just aren’t good. I watched one of the Astons under steer the last turn at Barber every single time he took it and constantly go off course kicking up dirt for everyone behind him.


ouch.

spdcrzy:

classandcars:

drivestvmotorsport:

A Viper misses his braking point during practice at the Toronto Pirelli World Challenge practice. 

I swear some WC drivers just aren’t good. I watched one of the Astons under steer the last turn at Barber every single time he took it and constantly go off course kicking up dirt for everyone behind him.

ouch.

Source: drivestvmotorsport

28th July 2014

Photo reblogged from I Have A Need For Speed with 391,123 notes

spdcrzy:

treesheahh:

driftoffacliff:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

and they said we wouldn’t use math later on in life

…. C’mon guise.

27% more donut per donut. can’t argue with that.

spdcrzy:

treesheahh:

driftoffacliff:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

and they said we wouldn’t use math later on in life

…. C’mon guise.

27% more donut per donut. can’t argue with that.

Source: nimstrz